Posts
144
Following
84
Followers
32
AS4242423219 on DN42
@tomjennings @vyr It's an option in the file sharing menu, but for some reason it only appears for certain file extensions (you can share arbitrary file types if you rename them to a supported extension).
0
0
2
@tomjennings @vyr It does exist - I've used it. There is a "Bluetooth" option to share a file in Android and has been for quite a while (I can confirm that it's present in LineageOS 22.1 and Android 12 on a Google Pixel 3, but I remember using it years ago on older versions of Android from other OEMs too). It uses OBEX and is compatible with bluez-obex's implementation on GNU/Linux (which KDE supports with bluedevil-sendfile, even without KDE Connect).
0
0
1
repeated

The variety of content on Radio 4 never ceases to amaze.

3
4
1
repeated

The existence of Norway implies the existence of Nandway.

5
5
1
@elly @semfault That looks more like £, not Ł
0
0
1
repeated

isn’t it good to open matrix and then

2
2
1
@lexfeathers I suggest XMPP. Both client and server implementations are significantly more lightweight than Matrix (like 16MiB vs 1.7GiB memory usage for prosody vs conduit), and in my experience it's generally much less broken. I have two Matrix clients (both Nheko) that refuse to verify each other and e2ee does not work.

You could also use IRC but you'd need to use some other service for file upload.
0
0
1
@vyr I don't know about iOS, but I thought support for OBEX file transfers was part of AOSP and so would be supported on any Android phone. Are some OEMs removing it for some reason?
1
0
1
@tomjennings @vyr Most smartphones support bluetooth file transfers
1
0
1
@outfrost @mcc @neia A web page would not be able to access other system io
1
0
0
@deadsuperhero @ariadne It's not just Synapse, although Synapse might be worse than the other implementations. I run a single-user Conduit server and it is currently using 1.4GiB of memory and has used ~32 minutes of CPU time in the 2 days it's been running. Compare to Prosody (an XMPP server), which is using 16MiB of memory and has used ~3 minutes of CPU time, and UnrealIRCd (an IRC server, linked to pissnet), which is using 21MiB of memory and has used ~4m30s of CPU time.
1
1
0
@tusooa @ariadne You can use Forgejo Actions with Codeberg but you must self-host the runners (source: https://docs.codeberg.org/ci/actions/). Codeberg hosts Woodpecker CI (see, for example, https://ci.codeberg.org/repos/13361/pipeline/43).
0
0
0

@tusooa @ariadne Codeberg CI does not use Forgejo Actions, it uses Woodpecker CI. I think Codeberg CI actually predates Forgejo Actions existing.

1
0
0
@civodul @zimoun In the case of Guix, turning off half of CI would certainly not reduce power consumption since more people would build from source without substitutes.
0
0
1
@stefano I have a 23" 1080p monitor and the 14" 1080p internal display of my ThinkPad. I voted two, but I don't always have the laptop lid open. It's smaller and at a less convenient angle, but useful so I can see stuff at a glance when doing something else on the external monitor. I always have it open when I play Luanti so I can see IRC at the same time.
0
0
1
@elly @karolherbst I've never had issues with audio playback while compiling and I compile on all threads (-j8) and don't use a separate drive. Video playback, on the other hand, I would expect to have issues depending on the codec and resolution (I only have hardware-accelerated decoding for H.264).
0
0
0
repeated

good god Lisbon airport is very active on GitHub

6
5
2
repeated
Edited 4 months ago

Instead of storing my data in the cloud, I just store it in the bush. It's the same thing, only palette-swapped. More accessible, too.

4
11
2
Show older