Noisytoot
Posts
1719Following
146Followers
72Also @noisytoot@mice.tel in case chinchillas eat the cables
Noisytoot
noisytoot
1
0
3
Noisytoot
repeated
repeated
Noisytoot
noisytoot
@Theorem_Poem what do you do if you don't have every passport you've ever had?
1
0
1
Noisytoot
noisytoot
@hexaheximal @diffie @kemona_halftau why not fstab? isn't mounting filesystems exactly what it's for?
bind mounts are indeed nice in embedded linux environments that you don't fully control. my server's BMC is running a proprietary GPL violation of a distro with a read-only cramfs rootfs and a read/write /nv partition and the way I got a shell on it without modifying the read-only rootfs was by dumping the firmware, booting it in QEMU, bind-mounting /bin/sh over /SMASH/msh from a script/config file in the /nv partition that got sourced as root on startup (it had an ancient version of dropbear that was hardcoded to execute /SMASH/msh (which was a really weird shell that appeared to have no useful functionality whatsoever)), and flashing the modified firmware. later I used more bind-mounts to replace other stuff in the read-only rootfs with my own stuff (like replacing the ancient busybox binary with a newer one)
bind mounts are indeed nice in embedded linux environments that you don't fully control. my server's BMC is running a proprietary GPL violation of a distro with a read-only cramfs rootfs and a read/write /nv partition and the way I got a shell on it without modifying the read-only rootfs was by dumping the firmware, booting it in QEMU, bind-mounting /bin/sh over /SMASH/msh from a script/config file in the /nv partition that got sourced as root on startup (it had an ancient version of dropbear that was hardcoded to execute /SMASH/msh (which was a really weird shell that appeared to have no useful functionality whatsoever)), and flashing the modified firmware. later I used more bind-mounts to replace other stuff in the read-only rootfs with my own stuff (like replacing the ancient busybox binary with a newer one)
0
0
1
Noisytoot
repeated
repeated
f_ 🇵🇸
fun
Gotta love when some excited developers share some ideas they have on their head, only for some unrelated troll to pretend to be a developer and troll people with extremely deceptive replies.
These excited developers, instead of getting constructive feedback and all, they get insults, deceptive feedback, attacks. All that because they wanted to share ideas they had on how to move forward (no code was yet written).
Sound familiar?
These excited developers, instead of getting constructive feedback and all, they get insults, deceptive feedback, attacks. All that because they wanted to share ideas they had on how to move forward (no code was yet written).
Sound familiar?
2
6
12
Noisytoot
repeated
repeated
Molly White
molly0xfff@hachyderm.iomy last name has wound up on some campaign database without my first name, so i keep hitting unsubscribe pages that ask "Not white? Please don't use this form"
27
6
1
Noisytoot
noisytoot
@ellis @catsalad @owashe @emilvolk @Pouet @Korawolfsrain @arti @cheeseburgerally mrow meow meeooowww miau mreoww nyaaaaa~ mrrrrp 
2
0
2
Noisytoot
noisytoot
@arti @catsalad @ellis @owashe @emilvolk @Pouet @Korawolfsrain @cheeseburgerally meow! mreow nyaaa mrrp meoww
1
0
3
@kemona_halftau I wish it had this or an option to hide end-of-poll notifications to avoid getting notifications from fediplayssnake
0
0
1
Noisytoot
repeated
repeated
Noisytoot
noisytoot
(technically in these photos the fox is in my neighbour's garden. I did see it in my garden first, but it escaped through the bush and I didn't get to take a photo before that happened)
0
0
0
Noisytoot
noisytoot
re: Flatpak/SystemD/AI/Surveillance age censorship
Show content
@tragivictoria @2something @alpinelinux @VoidLinux @thomholwerda
SystemD recently started AI-ifing
Oh no, code review! How horrible, they’re gonna catch more bugs!!
systemd (main)> git log --grep 'Co-developed-by:.*Claude' --oneline | wc -l
274
It’s not just code review.
and adding plumbing for surveillance age censorship (far beyond what any laws require of them)
Optional age entry is too much? What?
Yes, it is. The way to resist this age verification nonsense (and authoritarianism in general) is not to comply in advance.
0
0
1
@kemona_halftau @skydotbit I thought so too but apparently it's not actually a flatpak dev but just some random troll pretending to be one
0
1
0
Noisytoot
noisytoot
re: Flatpak/SystemD/AI/Surveillance age censorship
Show content
@2something @alpinelinux @VoidLinux yes, I can view the original posts
I'm using LibreWolf but with a dark theme as default (and using fingerprintingProtection instead of resistFingerprinting to allow me to make an exception to it so websites follow the dark theme preference). It's probably something to do with that.
I'm using LibreWolf but with a dark theme as default (and using fingerprintingProtection instead of resistFingerprinting to allow me to make an exception to it so websites follow the dark theme preference). It's probably something to do with that.
1
0
0