Posts
2224
Following
155
Followers
75
AS4242423219 on DN42
Also @noisytoot@mice.tel in case chinchillas eat the cables
repeated
@hexaheximal @pastthepixels GPL seems like a safe choice in that case because you can always relicense to something less restrictive like 0BSD (provided you're still the only copyright holder) but you can't revoke rights you've already granted
0
0
2
@mcc @tante an active member of Codeberg e.V. (as opposed to a supporting member, who cannot vote)
1
1
8
@jlink @dpk if you automatically ban only projects which are clearly labelled as slop, my concern is that this will cause people to simply not label their slop (which is much worse since it makes it harder to avoid)
1
0
2
@nelson @tante if you are a Codeberg e.V. member then the poll will be emailed to you
0
0
0

@gabboman @tante the precise wording of the amendment is:

You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by “generative AI”-tools

so it would have to be quite a large PR or over a long period of time

I think a bigger concern would be if this would cause people to simply not label their slop in order to evade detection

0
0
10
re: slop spam email
Show content
sent from a @contextagent.org address
0
0
1
slop spam email
Show content

I was looking at your GNU Guix channel, especially how you frame packages that are fully free software but not always ready to be upstreamed.

I’m curious how are you dealing with context loss from compaction?

what?

2
0
2
repeated
re: CW quote: GNU, sexual assault referenced in link
Show content

@mrmasterkeyboard I think you are overestimating the amount of central control GNU has over invididual packages. For example, there are several GNU packages hosted on GitLab.com and GitHub (specifically GNU Mailman and GNU Radio, maybe more), both of which require proprietary JavaScript to use and are officially considered by GNU to be unacceptable for hosting GNU packages.

0
0
1
good morning
0
0
1
good night
0
0
0
re: fsf, gnu, sexism, mention of assault
Show content
@mhoye iirc the last release was codenamed "Epstein Files" (edit: not the last release, but a few releases back)
0
0
3
re: link to page behind anubis pow challenge (requires javascript)
Show content
@kemona_halftau weird. that website is terribly designed and it makes me think the software probably isn't very good either. there's also an obnoxious animation around a thing at the bottom of the page that's always visible even when you scroll advertising eagle, it requires javascript to view at all for no good reason whatsoever, and all the unnecessary and annoying animations make even moving my cursor slow
0
0
1
question about the bad instance, re: this one is even more bad
Show content
@link what is the problem with TLA? (it's another one of those instances that I have heard vaguely bad things about, but nobody says specifically what's wrong with it)
1
0
0
Show older