@cwebber how would this even be possible for freedom-respecting operating systems? would it just make every GNU/Linux distro illegal unless its package manager implemented a pointless and trivial-to-bypass age check based on putting birth date in gecos (or something like that)?

@danct12 That's far too much (both for running it and for building)

@Edent

Keep at 350Mbps for a tenner more (£55) Rise to 500Mbps for a fiver more (£49)

… 500Mbps was cheaper than 350Mbps? That doesn’t make any sense.

Anyway, if it’s symmetric then gigabit is definitely useful for self-hosting.

@kottke 42.58/50

@ariadne @dalias https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/18/generating_passwords_with_llms/

@neil Yes, I got one before going to FOSDEM this year

@domi @nyanpasu64 apparently it just panics: https://github.com/FlyGoat/CSMWrap/issues/141

howdy you all! i come here needing a hand. as i’ve been struggling with both my mental and physical health as of late, i’ve been unable to do much in my daily life, and thus i’ve been struggling to get the essentials covered. if you’re able to, i’d appreciate it if you could spare me some so i can get myself back on track.

https://ko-fi.com/naydire/goal?g=0
goal: $150/300

this should be enough to last me for a while, and hopefully the last time i ask.

thanks everyone for helping me all this time, and hope everyone is doing well!

@eloy people actually use LLMs for password generation? why?

@kemona_halftau isn't that iceshrimp.net?

@whitequark the first one says "Abapter"

@weirdtreething would be nicer if it had generics and more architecture support

@whitequark @xgranade he was apparently an antisemite, but that probably won't be on the test

@whitequark I didn't realize the structure of DNA was invented in Britain in 1953. How did life exist before that?

@eloy I think it means that "Macronix International Co., Ltd." is often shortened to "Macronix", not "MCIX"

@nelson HTTP over XMPP

@algernon @imcdowall @petrillic EUPL is an odd license, because it has strong copyleft requirements like that and then a relicensing clause which just allows you to relicense to a weaker copyleft license (like GPLv2-only, GPLv3-only, or even any version of the GNU GPL via CeCILL v2 (because it allows relicensing to CeCILL v2 which itself allows relicensing to any version of the GNU GPL)) and bypass those requirements entirely.

I’d just use the AGPL. What is actually wrong with it anyway?

@aperture @solonovamax windows 1.0, makes sense to start at the beginning

@kemona_halftau @ellis triple meow!