RE: https://mastodon.social/@ieeespectrum/116059551433682789
> The volunteer community that built this encyclopedia has lately rejected a key innovation designed to serve readers.
this specifically means: they rejected covering Wikipedia in AI slop. This means a generational gap apparently. ok mate
GitHub: "Here’s what we plan to do for maintainers."
@bagder it's so laughable, so cringe that they brag about "pull request diff performances". These days github is barely usable anymore for patch reviews. The pr review tool is broken and slow. The two distinct versions they offer are in competition which one is more broken. Half the patch context links they have never get you to the right place, and they collapse anything by default that's larger than a couple of dozens of lines. So many clicks for everything. And the slow UI reaction times...
If you use AI-generated code, you currently cannot claim copyright on it in the US. If you fail to disclose/disclaim exactly which parts were not written by a human, you forfeit your copyright claim on *the entire codebase*.
This means copyright notices and even licenses folks are putting on their vibe-coded GitHub repos are unenforceable. The AI-generated code, and possibly the whole project, becomes public domain.
Source: https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB10922/LSB10922.8.pdf