amazing. supertux offers glibc appimage but not a musl appimage… this is why i was hesitant about alpine dangit

also no i wont use flatpak im already using it for one app and its taking up so much fucking space

@swirly there’s no such thing as a ‘musl appimage’

supertux is literally in the repos tho, wyd

@domi @swirly the package isn't updated to supertux 0.7 yet, which doesn't build on musl because it depends on the glibc-specific execinfo.h. there's an implementation of that that works on musl (libexecinfo), but it's not packaged yet either

@noisytoot @swirly execinfo sucks, i wonder why it’s even needed

@domi @swirly I think it's just for backtraces and they didn't know that musl doesn't have it so the build system doesn't check for it and just assumes that it exists

@noisytoot @swirly my hot take for today is that we shouldn’t include platform-specific garbage for backtraces in prod builds

@domi @swirly I agree