weh why is GRUB still default on alpine. first thing I do after install is throwing it out and installing gummiboot
@domi eh gummiboot is also unmaintained, would just use sd-boot tbh
@MarkAssPandi yesn’t - they changed the name for no fucking reason, then proceeded to make no changes. i fucking hate this behavior
@domi also the whole setup-alpine process is heavily outdated and can probably be just rewritten
@fossdd i don’t get what needs to be maintained about a fscking bootloader. i run it and it works. there’s no attack surface here, an attacker with a local access might as well replace my kernel
@weirdtreething oh, it also picks to use LVM by default now
alright i’m gonna do it by hand, i’m good
@domi generally yes, if it work for you, use it.
but i know that some people noticed bugs with gummiboot, and in case of gummiboot there is even a maintained sucessor, so for a distro bootloader i would certainly use sd-boot isntead
@domi @MarkAssPandi probably to try to evade all the hate that gets anything related to systems ?
@domi last time i messed with alpine it used lilo ?
(also actually worked on i686)@weirdtreething @domi also until recently (thanks @vixalientoots) it installed chrony as ntp client, when busybox even has its own ntp implementation, like wtf
@evv42 if you were on BIOS: likely not LILO but extlinux/syslinux. unless you used some insanely old 2.x
@fossdd @weirdtreething @vixalientoots i’m not that mad at chrony because it never got in my way. but yeah it’s weird
the whole alpine installer still leaves something to be desired. i’d love to recode it, but I’m fearing the absolute fucking bikeshed clusterfuck I’d end up in, so I think I’m gonna keep not touching alpine for the time being
@domi @weirdtreething @vixalientoots fair, i think just something simple like archinstall or chimeras new installer would be a major improvement. could be a testing package first and when enough people have used it, replace alpine-conf with it.
actually you know what, im gonna start with it now xd
@domi I'm not so up-to-date with the bootloader scene, so: what is wrong w/GRUB2?
@domi ye my bad didn’t know I thought gummiboot was more integrated with systemd since name change
@phaseseeker PITA to setup unless someone (your distro maintainer…) did it for you, and your setup is typical
codebase sucks, there’s a lot of old hacks in there
plus personal preference
@domi Had to search for gummiboot.
Didn't expect to find this.
So often I search for the name of some tech thing and end up getting jumpscared by something mundane and I never see it coming.
@domi for real… UAPI’s BLS is just so much better, even in the form of grub-bls from fedora/openSUSE
@domi @weirdtreething FWIW, you can replace what it uses by setting some environment variables. It’s documented in the wiki under sone section related to semi automated installation or something
@weirdtreething @domi and for me, 4GB is just too small.
But it's either "take the defaults" or "partition the disk manually" with setup-alpine...
@domi like im not systemd anti evangelist but afaik alpine doesnt use systemd so it’d explain that default i think
@domi why not go without a bootloader at all? efi stub works just fine, although i had to write my own tool to have it nicely configurable from a config file...