i see that porting GitHub to NT is going well

@davidgerard@circumstances.run I've been getting these today too, and when I posted about it a couple other people said they were as well. At least the unicorn is fun.

@abucci Equoid

@davidgerard they couldnt find the 4.0 floppies so they had to go with 3.5

@oxyhyxo 3.51 famously being the Good Version

@davidgerard What do you mean by porting GH to NT?

@davidgerard

LOL, is this a reference to how it took them three tries to port hotmail from FreeBSD/SunOS to NT and they ended up buying a company that ran a UNIX environment on top of NT to make it happen.

@davidgerard

Update: https://web.archive.org/web/20040401182755/http://www.securityoffice.net/mssecrets/hotmail.html

@davidgerard They scoured archive.org but no dice

@davidgerard Not until Linux NT is ready. Maybe if they run it on NT and ext4fs or anything *not* ntfs?

If they really did an inverted WSL and actually called it Linux NT, with that name would maybe none of the PHBs or mundanes even notice what was really going on or care? 🙃

@davidgerard @abucci I'm not sure those teeth are quite nasty enough

@fun see link elsewhere in the thread