it's great when you see a project you've been following for years has added a CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md file to the repo, and you have a little moment of sadness
then you click it and it says "AI must not be used for this project" and goes on to explain why
Move fast and break things means you have to fix the broken things. Move slow and make things means you have cool stuff to play with for longer. I think the choice is obvious.
If this doesnβt get GitHub to take security seriously, nothing will: https://xcancel.com/github/status/2056884788179726685
RE: https://zeroes.ca/@VeeRat/116603185859484562
The issue I'm seeing is, that criticizing AI for the harm it does equals criticizing a good friend of some and their natural reaction are along the lines of "they are a good person who help me a lot! It can't be!" and it becomes impossible to talk about it, because many, for that reason alone, just don't want to.
And yeah, those AI companies totally exploit this on purpose, I have no doubts about them knowing exactly what they are doing there.
2 weeks ago I gave a talk about postmarketOS at the spring NLUUG (Netherlands Unix Users Group) conference.
It's in English so should be accessible to all!
https://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/video/nluug/2026-05-07-vj26/postmarketos-av1.mp4
I spent my time trying to make it better. Not just write code, but find better or at least different ways to do so. Simpler, cleaner, more general, more comprehensible.
What's happening to day is a complete repudiation of everything I was trying to achieve.
RE: https://mastodon.social/@cmconseils/116589464367576074
But we need AI to make the investors happy!!! π
(maybe smth is wrong elsewhere that needs fixing...)