Conversation

Open Source History: Why Didn't BSD Beat Out GNU and Linux?

ï½¢ the BSD license did not force developers who borrowed or tweaked the BSD code for their own projects to share their source code publicly. That was good news for commercial companies wary of sharing their code, but bad for hackers who valued openness and transparency ï½£

https://www.channelfutures.com/connectivity/open-source-history-why-didn-t-bsd-beat-out-gnu-and-linux-

1
0
0

@jbz > "the BSD license did not force developers who borrowed or tweaked the BSD code for their own projects to share their source code publicly."

Neither does the . You're perfectly free to not publish things.

1
0
0
@amszmidt @jbz you're right. The GNU GPL only forces you to upload the source to *other* users you share your binary with.

But if you just took a GPL project and modified it just for yourself, you are absolutely fine not sharing the source.
1
0
0

@fun @jbz > forces you to upload the source

No it does not.

I wonder sometimes if people have read the text.. or the FAQ, or the bazillion articles published by the GNU project in this topic.

2
0
0
@amszmidt @jbz when I say upload the source, I meant making it available to your users, not literally uploading it publicly.
0
0
0

@amszmidt @fun @jbz people mostly don't read. They get information from random videos and memes.

1
0
1