@neil even if they're allowed, I think "contains LLM-generated code" should definitely at least be listed as an antifeature

@neil At least I guess F-Droid could mark it as anti-feature

@neil it seems ripe for an antifeature label at least.

@noisytoot @neil I’d say something even more general such as “Uses LLMs in developpment” to also catch LLM code reviews, issue triage, etc

@neil I'm willing to run LLM code, but I want it disclosed. Anti-feature is already built in to F-droid.

Human-made apps can still be bad. There are apps in the repo surely vulnerable to dozens of bugs due to how old they are.

@TheyCallMeHacked @neil possibly, but that's not quite the same as actually including LLM-generated code. it's more like using proprietary software for development (e.g. being hosted on github) compared to actually including proprietary software: they're both problems but not really the same

@neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
Also maybe deal with the influx of "AI chat" apps that's flodding F-Droid right now.
It has been several months since I was greeted by some LLM-accessing apps whenever I opened F-Droid.

Example:
https://f-droid.org/packages/dev.chungjungsoo.gptmobile

@neil It is clear that lots of people expect a clear answer on LLM code from F-Droid, and I think it is always good to get our user-first perspective out there. At the very least, we should be discussing this more. I would love to engage fully in this discussion. I'm pretty buried these days keeping other parts of F-Droid going, so for the time being, I'll have to mostly cheer from the sidelines.